|
關(guān)注：1
2013-05-23 12:21
求翻譯：” With respect to the 1974-75 recession, the study compared companies that did and did not cut back on advertising budgets. It was found that by 1977 sales for companies that did not cut back had doubled relative to the recession bottom point while profits tripled;是什么意思？ 待解決
 懸賞分：1
- 離問(wèn)題結(jié)束還有
” With respect to the 1974-75 recession, the study compared companies that did and did not cut back on advertising budgets. It was found that by 1977 sales for companies that did not cut back had doubled relative to the recession bottom point while profits tripled;
問(wèn)題補(bǔ)充： |
|
2013-05-23 12:21:38
“關(guān)于1974-75年經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退，這項(xiàng)研究相比，也并沒(méi)有削減廣告預(yù)算的公司。結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)，相對(duì)于經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退的底部點(diǎn)，而1977年沒(méi)有削減公司的銷(xiāo)售增加了一倍的利潤(rùn)增加了兩倍;
|
|
2013-05-23 12:23:18
"關(guān)于1974至75年的衰退,這項(xiàng)研究公司相比,也并不削減廣告預(yù)算。 據(jù)認(rèn)為,1977年的銷(xiāo)售額為公司,不削減了一倍,相對(duì)的衰退而利潤(rùn)底點(diǎn)三倍;
|
|
2013-05-23 12:24:58
”關(guān)于1974-75后退，在廣告預(yù)算做和沒(méi)有削減的研究被比較的公司。 它被發(fā)現(xiàn)由1977銷(xiāo)售為沒(méi)有削減加倍了相對(duì)后退底部點(diǎn)的公司，當(dāng)贏利成了三倍時(shí);
|
|
2013-05-23 12:26:38
"1974年-75 衰退，相對(duì)于公司，并沒(méi)有不削減廣告預(yù)算比較研究。它被發(fā)現(xiàn) 1977 年沒(méi)有不削減的公司的銷(xiāo)售額已增長(zhǎng)一倍相對(duì)于經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退底部點(diǎn)雖然增加了兩倍的利潤(rùn) ；
|
|
2013-05-23 12:28:18
“關(guān)于1974-75年經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退，這項(xiàng)研究相比，也并沒(méi)有削減廣告預(yù)算的公司。結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)，相對(duì)于經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退的底部點(diǎn)，而1977年沒(méi)有削減公司的銷(xiāo)售增加了一倍的利潤(rùn)增加了兩倍;
|
湖北省互聯(lián)網(wǎng)違法和不良信息舉報(bào)平臺(tái) | 網(wǎng)上有害信息舉報(bào)專(zhuān)區(qū) | 電信詐騙舉報(bào)專(zhuān)區(qū) | 涉歷史虛無(wú)主義有害信息舉報(bào)專(zhuān)區(qū) | 涉企侵權(quán)舉報(bào)專(zhuān)區(qū)
