|
關(guān)注:1
2013-05-23 12:21
求翻譯:過去的就讓它過去 以下的情形是否常見?有一件不合身的衣裳,你一直不肯丟,原因是當(dāng)初花了很多錢買的。支持你如此不智決定的叫“沉沒成本”謬誤。 這種現(xiàn)象背后的原因是:我們越是投資在某件事情上,就越覺得難以割舍。為了避免讓“沉沒成本”影響你的決策,得隨時提醒自己:過去的就讓它過去。是什么意思?![]() ![]() 過去的就讓它過去 以下的情形是否常見?有一件不合身的衣裳,你一直不肯丟,原因是當(dāng)初花了很多錢買的。支持你如此不智決定的叫“沉沒成本”謬誤。 這種現(xiàn)象背后的原因是:我們越是投資在某件事情上,就越覺得難以割舍。為了避免讓“沉沒成本”影響你的決策,得隨時提醒自己:過去的就讓它過去。
問題補充: |
|
2013-05-23 12:21:38
The past is the past following the situation common? One does not fit the clothes, you have been unwilling to lose, had spent a lot of money. Support you so unwise decision to call the "sunk cost" fallacy. The reasons behind this phenomenon: the more we invest in something, the more you find it diff
|
|
2013-05-23 12:23:18
In the past it has in the past for the following circumstances are common? There is not a part of his cloak, which you have been refused to lose, because we spent a lot of money. Support your decision is not so-called "sunk cost fallacy". This is the reason behind it is: The more we invest in somet
|
|
2013-05-23 12:24:58
The past let it pass by following situation was whether common? Some not good-fitting upper and lower garments, you are not willing to lose, the reason is when first flowering very many money have bought.Supports calling which your so wisdom did not decide “submersion cost” error. Behind this kind o
|
|
2013-05-23 12:26:38
Let it past the following situations are common in the past? An ill-fitting clothes, and you refused to lose, because had spent a lot of money. Support you such an unwise decision called "sunk costs" fallacy. The reason behind this is: the more we invest on something, the more they find it hard to l
|
|
2013-05-23 12:28:18
正在翻譯,請等待...
|
湖北省互聯(lián)網(wǎng)違法和不良信息舉報平臺 | 網(wǎng)上有害信息舉報專區(qū) | 電信詐騙舉報專區(qū) | 涉歷史虛無主義有害信息舉報專區(qū) | 涉企侵權(quán)舉報專區(qū)