|
關注：1
2013-05-23 12:21
求翻譯：Professors Michael Asimow and Jeffrey Lubbers have argued for a slightly different formulation of this idea. They suggest creation of “a single adjudicating tribunal, referred to as a Benefits Review Tribunal [BRT]” which would handle benefits review cases from Social Security, the Veterans Administration, and perhaps 是什么意思？ 待解決
 懸賞分：1
- 離問題結束還有
Professors Michael Asimow and Jeffrey Lubbers have argued for a slightly different formulation of this idea. They suggest creation of “a single adjudicating tribunal, referred to as a Benefits Review Tribunal [BRT]” which would handle benefits review cases from Social Security, the Veterans Administration, and perhaps
問題補充： |
|
2013-05-23 12:21:38
教授的邁克爾asimow和杰弗里·呂貝爾斯主張的這種想法略有不同配方。他們建議建立“一個單一的審理庭被稱為福利審查庭[BRT]”這將處理從社會保障的福利，退伍軍人管理局，或許福利由勞動部門管理的程序審查案件。他們建議的制度，發現其根源，在澳大利亞的澳大利亞行政上訴法庭。在抽象的，該提案可能提請行政法官的大力支持，因為它以外的地方為他們判決案件的機構，并有助于確保其獨立性。然而，行政法官會理事機構“硬法”和“軟”法。換句話說，至少在理論上，在這個新的審裁處的行政法官將不能預期或允許“制定
|
|
2013-05-23 12:23:18
|
|
2013-05-23 12:24:58
|
|
2013-05-23 12:26:38
|
|
2013-05-23 12:28:18
|
湖北省互聯網違法和不良信息舉報平臺 | 網上有害信息舉報專區 | 電信詐騙舉報專區 | 涉歷史虛無主義有害信息舉報專區 | 涉企侵權舉報專區
