For this, the Russian literary critic Belinsky spoke of: "You will not be the poet vector loyal to the tendency of the poet he imposed, but asked him vector loyal to his own tendency to not go against his own nature, do not escape his vocation. "

On this point, the Russian literary critic, I said, "You will not be eligible for poet poet impose loyal to his preference, but asked him to remain loyal to his own qualifications, and the tendency will not go against his own nature, and do not shirk his duty."

Regarding this point, Russian literature critic other Lynskey once talked about: “You will not be request the poet arrow to be loyal to him to impose in poet's tendency, but is requests his arrow to be loyal to his tendency, do not have to violate his instinct, do not have to evade his inherent resp

On this point, Russian literary critic Belinski talked: "you will not require vector loyal to his tendency to impose on the poet of poets, but his vector loyal to himself, not to go against his own instincts, not to evade his duty"

正在翻譯，請等待...