|
關(guān)注：1
2013-05-23 12:21
求翻譯：This paper argues that the Roberts Court’s preemption decisions suggest a pattern of deferring to state laws in “regulatory” contexts while presumptively preempting them in “commercial” contexts. As I use these terms, “commercial” contexts involve federal and state laws having the purpose of defining the rules for barg是什么意思？ 待解決
 懸賞分：1
- 離問題結(jié)束還有
This paper argues that the Roberts Court’s preemption decisions suggest a pattern of deferring to state laws in “regulatory” contexts while presumptively preempting them in “commercial” contexts. As I use these terms, “commercial” contexts involve federal and state laws having the purpose of defining the rules for barg
問題補(bǔ)充： |
|
2013-05-23 12:21:38
正在翻譯，請等待...
|
|
2013-05-23 12:23:18
這份文件稱,羅伯茨法院決定的搶占延,表明國家法律在“監(jiān)管”環(huán)境,搶占他們必定在「商業(yè)」上下文。 ,我用這些條款,“商業(yè)”上下文涉及聯(lián)邦和各州的法律為目的的定義規(guī)則談判,討價(jià)還價(jià)的違約救濟(jì)措施,而“規(guī)管”上下文涉及州和聯(lián)邦法律的界定的各方討價(jià)還價(jià)的基準(zhǔn)應(yīng)享權(quán)利。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:24:58
|
|
2013-05-23 12:26:38
這篇論文辯稱，羅伯茨法院的搶占決定建議推遲到在"監(jiān)管"的上下文中的國家法律而被推定為 「 商業(yè) 」 的上下文中搶占他們的圖案。我使用這些術(shù)語，"商業(yè)"的范圍涉及聯(lián)邦和州法律具有定義的
|
|
2013-05-23 12:28:18
|
湖北省互聯(lián)網(wǎng)違法和不良信息舉報(bào)平臺(tái) | 網(wǎng)上有害信息舉報(bào)專區(qū) | 電信詐騙舉報(bào)專區(qū) | 涉歷史虛無主義有害信息舉報(bào)專區(qū) | 涉企侵權(quán)舉報(bào)專區(qū)
