|
關注:1
2013-05-23 12:21
求翻譯:4. Although Shipowners allege that Anfari Bill was issued without authority, the Chief Officer did accept a cargo of Iron Ore lumps of 8,112 MT with the stamp of J.Tong Shipping Co naming Longfair as the Shipper. Therefore, Longfair should be entitled to demand an original set of Bills of Lading under Hague-Visby 是什么意思?![]() ![]() 4. Although Shipowners allege that Anfari Bill was issued without authority, the Chief Officer did accept a cargo of Iron Ore lumps of 8,112 MT with the stamp of J.Tong Shipping Co naming Longfair as the Shipper. Therefore, Longfair should be entitled to demand an original set of Bills of Lading under Hague-Visby
問題補充: |
|
2013-05-23 12:21:38
4。雖然船東聲稱Anfari條例草案“未經授權而發行,主任也接受郵票J.通船務公司命名Longfair作為托運人的貨物8112噸鐵礦石腫塊。因此,Longfair應有權要求原設置條例草案根據“海牙 - 維斯比規則”提單。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:23:18
4. 雖然船東說anfari條例草案是沒有權力發出,首席干事未接受一塊鐵礦砂的貨物的11,114噸的印花的J.塘航運合作longfair命名為托運人。 因此,longfair應當有權要求一個原始的提單根據《海牙-維斯比規則》。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:24:58
4. 雖然船東宣稱Anfari比爾被發布了,不用當局,主管接受了8,112 MT鐵礦石團貨物與J.Tong運輸Co郵票命名Longfair的作為托運人。 所以,應該有資格Longfair根據Hague-Visby規則要求原始的套提貨單。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:26:38
4.雖然船東聲稱未獲授權而發出 Anfari 條例草案,總裁確實接受貨物的鐵礦石塊的 8,112 山命名為托運人 Longfair J.Tong 船務公司的公章。因此,Longfair 應該有權要求根據海牙-維斯比規則提單的原始集。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:28:18
|
湖北省互聯網違法和不良信息舉報平臺 | 網上有害信息舉報專區 | 電信詐騙舉報專區 | 涉歷史虛無主義有害信息舉報專區 | 涉企侵權舉報專區