|
關注：1
2013-05-23 12:21
求翻譯：Breaking with a precedent set in Griggs v. Duke Power Company, the Supreme Court said the employees (not the employer) had the burden of showing any disparity was caused by the employers disputed practice. Recall that in Griggs v. Duke Power Company the Supreme Court had defined what was meant by unfair discrimination;是什么意思？ 待解決
 懸賞分：1
- 離問題結束還有
Breaking with a precedent set in Griggs v. Duke Power Company, the Supreme Court said the employees (not the employer) had the burden of showing any disparity was caused by the employers disputed practice. Recall that in Griggs v. Duke Power Company the Supreme Court had defined what was meant by unfair discrimination;
問題補充： |
|
2013-05-23 12:21:38
打破格里格斯訴杜克電力公司開創了一個先例，最高法院說，員工（雇主）有任何的差距是由雇主有爭議的做法引起的負擔。回想一下格里格斯訴杜克電力公司，在最高法院已確定什么是不公平的歧視的意思，它也放在用人單位的舉證責任，表明雇用問題的做法是與工作相關的，當它產生不利影響的一個受保護的成員類。后的格里格斯情況，證明你是非法歧視往往意味著只是統計顯示，例如，職位分類是主要由白人舉行，而第二個不太吸引人的分類主要由非白人舉行。這項統計的情況下作出的，舉證責任轉移到用人單位，以證明其就業的做法擔任一個必要的商業目的辯護，成為被稱為業務需要防御。安裝在這種情況下的自衛往往是如此昂貴，很多雇主沒
|
|
2013-05-23 12:23:18
|
|
2013-05-23 12:24:58
|
|
2013-05-23 12:26:38
|
|
2013-05-23 12:28:18
|
湖北省互聯網違法和不良信息舉報平臺 | 網上有害信息舉報專區 | 電信詐騙舉報專區 | 涉歷史虛無主義有害信息舉報專區 | 涉企侵權舉報專區
