|
關注:1
2013-05-23 12:21
求翻譯:i do not know who was first responsible for this analogy of the mind to a dead instrument.whoever was the originator ,there can be no doubt of the authority which has acquired by the continuous approval bestow upon it by eminent person.but whatever its weight of authority,whatever the high approval which it can quote是什么意思?![]() ![]() i do not know who was first responsible for this analogy of the mind to a dead instrument.whoever was the originator ,there can be no doubt of the authority which has acquired by the continuous approval bestow upon it by eminent person.but whatever its weight of authority,whatever the high approval which it can quote
問題補充: |
|
2013-05-23 12:21:38
我不知道誰是第一本心靈的比喻死instrument.whoever負責發端,可以毫無疑問已經收購了連續批準后,由著名person.but賦予的權力無論其重量權力,無論高的批準,它可以舉出,我已經沒有hesitastion譴責的教育理論,介紹了有史以來最致命的,錯誤的和危險的概念之一。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:23:18
我不知道誰是第一個負責這個比喻的文書的心來一個死”的發端人是誰,不可能有任何疑問的管理局已獲得批準的不斷賦予它的杰出人士。但無論其重量的權力,不論該高批準,可以引述,我沒有hesitastion在譴責它作為一個最致命、錯誤、和危險觀念不斷推出的理論教育。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:24:58
我不知道誰首先負責對頭腦的這比喻對死的instrument.whoever是創作者,不可以有由連續的認同獲取了贈送在它由突
|
|
2013-05-23 12:26:38
不知道是誰第一次心靈的死 instrument.whoever,這個比喻為發端人,可以有無疑已取得連續批準由主管當局賦予它的知名人士而言,無論其重量的權威,無論高批準,它可以引用,我有沒有 hesitastion 譴責這是一種最致命的錯誤和危險的概念不斷引入教育理論。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:28:18
|
湖北省互聯網違法和不良信息舉報平臺 | 網上有害信息舉報專區 | 電信詐騙舉報專區 | 涉歷史虛無主義有害信息舉報專區 | 涉企侵權舉報專區