|
關注：1
2013-05-23 12:21
求翻譯：- Case: London Chartered Bank of Australia v Kerr (Held that as the other partners had not objected to the previous cheque transactions, the bank were right to assume that his co-partners had authorized the promissory note)是什么意思？ 待解決
 懸賞分：1
- 離問題結束還有
- Case: London Chartered Bank of Australia v Kerr (Held that as the other partners had not objected to the previous cheque transactions, the bank were right to assume that his co-partners had authorized the promissory note)
問題補充： |
湖北省互聯網違法和不良信息舉報平臺 | 網上有害信息舉報專區 | 電信詐騙舉報專區 | 涉歷史虛無主義有害信息舉報專區 | 涉企侵權舉報專區
