|
關注：1
2013-05-23 12:21
求翻譯：上述算例中，本文方法與對比方法的ATC計算結果完全相同，兩斷面ATC的計算時間統計見表6。由表可見，傳統算法耗時較長，不能滿足在線計算的要求，而采取本文改進策略后，僅用時179s，計算速度提高了8.1倍，完全滿足每10~15min在線刷新一次ATC的計算要求。是什么意思？ 待解決
 懸賞分：1
- 離問題結束還有
上述算例中，本文方法與對比方法的ATC計算結果完全相同，兩斷面ATC的計算時間統計見表6。由表可見，傳統算法耗時較長，不能滿足在線計算的要求，而采取本文改進策略后，僅用時179s，計算速度提高了8.1倍，完全滿足每10~15min在線刷新一次ATC的計算要求。
問題補充： |
|
2013-05-23 12:21:38
The above examples, the proposed method and comparison method identical to the ATC calculations, the two sections of the ATC calculation time statistics in Table 6. Seen from the table, time-consuming traditional algorithm can not meet the requirements of online computing, and to improve this strate
|
|
2013-05-23 12:23:18
正在翻譯，請等待...
|
|
2013-05-23 12:24:58
In the above example, this article method and the comparative method ATC computed result is completely same, two cross section ATC computing time statistics see Table 6.Is obvious by the table, the traditional algorithm consumes when is long, cannot satisfy the online computation the request, after
|
|
2013-05-23 12:26:38
In the above example, ATC calculation method and comparison of methods in this article are identical, two-section ATC calculation time statistics are provided in table 6. Is made visible, the traditional algorithm that takes a long time and does not meet the online calculation of requirements, and t
|
|
2013-05-23 12:28:18
The above examples, the proposed method and comparison method identical to the ATC calculations, the two sections of the ATC calculation time statistics in Table 6. Seen from the table, time-consuming traditional algorithm can not meet the requirements of online computing, and to improve this strate
|
湖北省互聯網違法和不良信息舉報平臺 | 網上有害信息舉報專區 | 電信詐騙舉報專區 | 涉歷史虛無主義有害信息舉報專區 | 涉企侵權舉報專區
