|
關注：1
2013-05-23 12:21
求翻譯：從比較中可以發現，無論是價格還是性能，都是FTTB＋LAN占優。但是FTTB＋LAN的覆蓋范圍只有100米，初期投資時需要設置大量樓道設備箱，當接入率較低時，FTTB＋LAN的成本反而高于ADSL。再加上FTTB＋LAN在老小區需要重新鋪設線纜，因此目前國內的老舊小區寬帶接入還是以ADSL為主。是什么意思？ 待解決
 懸賞分：1
- 離問題結束還有
從比較中可以發現，無論是價格還是性能，都是FTTB＋LAN占優。但是FTTB＋LAN的覆蓋范圍只有100米，初期投資時需要設置大量樓道設備箱，當接入率較低時，FTTB＋LAN的成本反而高于ADSL。再加上FTTB＋LAN在老小區需要重新鋪設線纜，因此目前國內的老舊小區寬帶接入還是以ADSL為主。
問題補充： |
|
2013-05-23 12:21:38
null
|
|
2013-05-23 12:23:18
It can be found from the comparison, whether they are price and performance are FTTB + LAN predominate. But the coverage of FTTB + LAN only 100 meters, the initial investment needs to be set at a large hallway, when access to equipment boxes with a lower rate, when the cost instead FTTB + LAN ADSL h
|
|
2013-05-23 12:24:58
May discover from the comparison, regardless of is the price or the performance, all is FTTB+LAN occupies superiorly.But FTTB+LAN cover scope when 100 meters, initial investment needs to establish the massive corridor equipment box, when turns on lowly rate, the FTTB+LAN cost instead is higher than
|
|
2013-05-23 12:26:38
From the comparison can be found in both price and performance are the FTTB+LAN-dominated. But the coverage is only 100 meters of FTTB+LAN, the initial investment needs to be set when a large number of corridor equipment box, when the access rate is low, FTTB+LAN have higher costs than ADSL. Combine
|
|
2013-05-23 12:28:18
null
|
湖北省互聯網違法和不良信息舉報平臺 | 網上有害信息舉報專區 | 電信詐騙舉報專區 | 涉歷史虛無主義有害信息舉報專區 | 涉企侵權舉報專區
