Compare several methods of NAM, said the case, said the latest GNAM algorithm makes several sub-modes algorithm relative to the RNAM that have significantly reduced, reducing 8211-162166, while the DRNAM efficient than GNAM that, relative to said compression GNAM rate of 8.9% -19.1%, compared RNAM t

Compared to the case in several NAM said method, the latest GNAM algorithm that few vis-à-vis the child model RNAM algorithm that there has been a significant reduction, by 8211, and 162,166 - than GNAM DRNAM said more efficient, vis-à-vis GNAM said compression rate - 19.1 per cent, compared with 8.

Compared with a next several kind of NAM expression method situation, the newest GNAM expression algorithm caused the subschema number to be opposite in the RNAM expression algorithm had the large reduction, reduced 8211-162166, but DRNAM was higher than the GNAM expression efficiency, is opposite i

Compare several NAM representation, GNAM said of the latest algorithm makes subpattern number relative to the RNAM algorithm had been sharply reduced, reduced 8211-162166, and DRNAM than the GNAM said more efficient, compression rate of 8.9% per cent relative to GNAM said, 11929-275497 less than RNA

Compare several methods of NAM, said the case, said the latest GNAM algorithm makes several sub-modes algorithm relative to the RNAM that have significantly reduced, reducing 8211-162166, while the DRNAM efficient than GNAM that, relative to said compression GNAM rate of 8.9% -19.1%, compared RNAM t