|
關注：1
2013-05-23 12:21
求翻譯：Apparently, a purely operational way of looking at mathematics would be quite appropriate. Indeed, to an unprejudiced and insightful person, the very notion of "mathematical object" may appear superfluous: since processes seem to be the only real concern of mathematics, why bother about these elusive, philosophically p是什么意思？ 待解決
 懸賞分：1
- 離問題結束還有
Apparently, a purely operational way of looking at mathematics would be quite appropriate. Indeed, to an unprejudiced and insightful person, the very notion of "mathematical object" may appear superfluous: since processes seem to be the only real concern of mathematics, why bother about these elusive, philosophically p
問題補充： |
|
2013-05-23 12:21:38
正在翻譯，請等待...
|
|
2013-05-23 12:23:18
顯然,一個純粹是可行的方法來看數學會是很適當。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:24:58
正在翻譯，請等待...
|
|
2013-05-23 12:26:38
很顯然，看一看數學的純粹是出於作業方式是相當適當的。事實上，給無偏見和最有見解的人，"數學物件"的說法可能會出現多餘的： 由於進程似乎是唯一真正關切的數學問題，為什麼費心這些難以捉摸的哲學問題"東西"，如無限集或"的有序對聚合"嗎？從理論上是可能純粹運作上做數學幾乎所有的： 我們可著手從基本流程進行更高級別的進程，然後到更複雜的進程無過指的任何種類的抽象物件
|
|
2013-05-23 12:28:18
正在翻譯，請等待...
|
湖北省互聯網違法和不良信息舉報平臺 | 網上有害信息舉報專區 | 電信詐騙舉報專區 | 涉歷史虛無主義有害信息舉報專區 | 涉企侵權舉報專區
